Editing
Academic Versus LLM
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
[[Category:Stories]] A pure academic would make an excellent LLM: Consuming great volumes of knowledge and calling them forth in response to the right prompt, combined and restated with references if desired, but lacking substantial processing in between. Imagine asking such a person, or LLM; "Is this study's method and conclusion valid?" They might reply by saying, "It's from Harvard Medical School," or, "Here are six similar studies that reached similar conclusions." It is a valuable and important function in society. It is different from creating new knowledge, but it is quite valuable.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Iterative Chaos Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see
Iterative Chaos Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information